lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Sep]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] must fix list


Andrew Morton wrote:

>Nick Piggin <piggin@cyberone.com.au> wrote:
>
>> I don't know what happened to this, but I thought it was quite good.
>> Maybe I missed something?
>>
>
>It just didn't seem very relevant: people weren't keeping me up to date and
>a lot of the patches which were going in weren't related to anything on the
>lists.
>

I liked it. I think it gives you a good idea of the bigger changes
that need to happen and who is doing what. It might be a good idea to
keep around when you want to impose some sort of code freeze.

>
>> Anyway I have removed AS from the list because it is done. I removed CFQ
>> as well because when the schedulers become runtime selectable (sometime
>> I hope), merging it becomes a non issue, even during the stable series I
>> think.
>>
>> I updated the kernel/sched.c section a bit.
>>
>> I moved 64-bit dev_t from should fix to must fix.
>>
>> It looks like quite a bit can be struck off, but I'll leave it up to those
>> who actually did the work.
>>
>
>Thanks. Just for you, I'll do an update.
>

Hows it going?

>
>> Maybe these should go in Documentation/must-fix/ to make patching and
>> syncing easier?
>>
>
>maybe...
>
>

IMO it would help

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:48    [W:0.076 / U:0.544 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site