Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 24 Sep 2003 23:12:53 +1000 | From | Nick Piggin <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] must fix list |
| |
Andrew Morton wrote:
>Nick Piggin <piggin@cyberone.com.au> wrote: > >> I don't know what happened to this, but I thought it was quite good. >> Maybe I missed something? >> > >It just didn't seem very relevant: people weren't keeping me up to date and >a lot of the patches which were going in weren't related to anything on the >lists. >
I liked it. I think it gives you a good idea of the bigger changes that need to happen and who is doing what. It might be a good idea to keep around when you want to impose some sort of code freeze.
> >> Anyway I have removed AS from the list because it is done. I removed CFQ >> as well because when the schedulers become runtime selectable (sometime >> I hope), merging it becomes a non issue, even during the stable series I >> think. >> >> I updated the kernel/sched.c section a bit. >> >> I moved 64-bit dev_t from should fix to must fix. >> >> It looks like quite a bit can be struck off, but I'll leave it up to those >> who actually did the work. >> > >Thanks. Just for you, I'll do an update. >
Hows it going?
> >> Maybe these should go in Documentation/must-fix/ to make patching and >> syncing easier? >> > >maybe... > >
IMO it would help
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |