Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 2 Sep 2003 20:08:03 +0200 | From | Andrew Lunn <> | Subject | Re: 2.6-test4 Traditional pty and devfs |
| |
> Well, that's why we have UNIX98 ptys. My preferred fix for this > issue would be to just axe traditional ptys, although this would probably > make it us incompatible with libc5. > > Why aren't you using the new-style ptys?
Ripperx, the program that is failing, is not mine. I have no control over what sort of pty it uses. Im sure there are other programs with use traditional pty's as well.
Andrew
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > Well, that's why we have UNIX98 ptys. My preferred fix for this > issue would be to just axe traditional ptys, although this would probably > make it us incompatible with libc5. > > Why aren't you using the new-style ptys?
Ripperx, the program that is failing, is not mine. I have no control over what sort of pty it uses. Im sure there are other programs with use traditional pty's as well.
Andrew
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |