Messages in this thread | | | From | Marc-Christian Petersen <> | Subject | Re: 2.4.22aa1 | Date | Tue, 2 Sep 2003 20:38:39 +0200 |
| |
On Tuesday 02 September 2003 04:02, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
Hi Andrea,
> Only in 2.4.22aa1: 20_sched-o1-fixes-10 > Only in 2.4.22pre7aa1: 20_sched-o1-fixes-9 > Changed the CHILD_PENALTY logic to be centered around > 50%. From Kurt Garloff.
the changes 's/CHILD_PENALTY/CHILD_INHERITANCE' and "s/PARENT_PENALTIY//' are really awfull for desktops. If I change child_inheritance from 60 to 95 and reintroduce the logic with parent_penaltiy, it's alot smooter under load.
I think these logics should be #ifdef'ed with CONFIG_DESKTOP, no?
ciao, Marc
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ On Tuesday 02 September 2003 04:02, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
Hi Andrea,
> Only in 2.4.22aa1: 20_sched-o1-fixes-10 > Only in 2.4.22pre7aa1: 20_sched-o1-fixes-9 > Changed the CHILD_PENALTY logic to be centered around > 50%. From Kurt Garloff.
the changes 's/CHILD_PENALTY/CHILD_INHERITANCE' and "s/PARENT_PENALTIY//' are really awfull for desktops. If I change child_inheritance from 60 to 95 and reintroduce the logic with parent_penaltiy, it's alot smooter under load.
I think these logics should be #ifdef'ed with CONFIG_DESKTOP, no?
ciao, Marc
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |