lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Sep]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] must fix list
Nick Piggin <piggin@cyberone.com.au> wrote:
>
> I don't know what happened to this, but I thought it was quite good.
> Maybe I missed something?

It just didn't seem very relevant: people weren't keeping me up to date and
a lot of the patches which were going in weren't related to anything on the
lists.

> Anyway I have removed AS from the list because it is done. I removed CFQ
> as well because when the schedulers become runtime selectable (sometime
> I hope), merging it becomes a non issue, even during the stable series I
> think.
>
> I updated the kernel/sched.c section a bit.
>
> I moved 64-bit dev_t from should fix to must fix.
>
> It looks like quite a bit can be struck off, but I'll leave it up to those
> who actually did the work.

Thanks. Just for you, I'll do an update.

> Maybe these should go in Documentation/must-fix/ to make patching and
> syncing easier?

maybe...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:48    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans