Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 16 Sep 2003 23:47:46 -0700 | From | Andrew Morton <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] must fix list |
| |
Nick Piggin <piggin@cyberone.com.au> wrote: > > I don't know what happened to this, but I thought it was quite good. > Maybe I missed something?
It just didn't seem very relevant: people weren't keeping me up to date and a lot of the patches which were going in weren't related to anything on the lists.
> Anyway I have removed AS from the list because it is done. I removed CFQ > as well because when the schedulers become runtime selectable (sometime > I hope), merging it becomes a non issue, even during the stable series I > think. > > I updated the kernel/sched.c section a bit. > > I moved 64-bit dev_t from should fix to must fix. > > It looks like quite a bit can be struck off, but I'll leave it up to those > who actually did the work.
Thanks. Just for you, I'll do an update.
> Maybe these should go in Documentation/must-fix/ to make patching and > syncing easier?
maybe... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |