Messages in this thread | | | From | "Henning P. Schmiedehausen" <> | Subject | Re: freed_symbols [Re: People, not GPL [was: Re: Driver Model]] | Date | Mon, 15 Sep 2003 00:17:37 +0000 (UTC) |
| |
Erik Andersen <andersen@codepoet.org> writes:
>When you are done making noise, please explain how a closed >source binary only product that runs within the context of the >Linux kernel is not a derivitive work and therefore not subject >to the terms of the GPL, per the definition given in the kernel >COPYING file that grants you your limited rights for copying, >distribution and modification.
"Because Linus said so".
Regards Henning
-- Dipl.-Inf. (Univ.) Henning P. Schmiedehausen INTERMETA GmbH hps@intermeta.de +49 9131 50 654 0 http://www.intermeta.de/
Java, perl, Solaris, Linux, xSP Consulting, Web Services freelance consultant -- Jakarta Turbine Development -- hero for hire
"Dominate!! Dominate!! Eat your young and aggregate! I have grotty silicon!" -- AOL CD when played backwards (User Friendly - 200-10-15) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |