lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Sep]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    SubjectRe: Memory mapped IO vs Port IO
    From
    On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 11:58:07AM -0700, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
    > >> Also - a perhaps more useful test is a write followed by a read.
    > >
    > > Well, someone else will have to run that test. On Altix, a read() is
    > > freakishly expensive, and I'm not really interested in showing everyone
    > > how bad it is ;)
    >
    > I find percentile comparisons useful for hiding the embarassement
    > of occasional hardware realities ;-) (ie what's the speed *ratio*
    > between the two types of read).

    Well, in our case, read() and in() will be pretty close,
    percentage-wise. The read() in itself is so bad that I think the
    additional badness of in() will be mostly hidden.

    Jesse
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:48    [W:0.021 / U:0.944 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site