[lkml]   [2003]   [Sep]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC] Enabling other oom schemes
On Thu, 2003-09-11 at 22:19, Rusty Lynch wrote:

> The patch works (although by looking over oom_kill.c, I'm sure oom_panic.c
> will panic too soon), but it is really only a quick hack to see how people
> feel about such an approach.

I like this a _lot_, it is something I have thought about doing, and
something we have a need for at MontaVista.

But I think its a lot more useful if we have alternative overcommit
modes to use with it.

An oom_nop might be a good idea. But some different policies, i.e. ones
with more determinism but less smarts, are interesting.

Robert Love

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:48    [W:0.170 / U:0.124 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site