[lkml]   [2003]   [Sep]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [RFC] Enabling other oom schemes
    On Thu, 2003-09-11 at 22:19, Rusty Lynch wrote:

    > The patch works (although by looking over oom_kill.c, I'm sure oom_panic.c
    > will panic too soon), but it is really only a quick hack to see how people
    > feel about such an approach.

    I like this a _lot_, it is something I have thought about doing, and
    something we have a need for at MontaVista.

    But I think its a lot more useful if we have alternative overcommit
    modes to use with it.

    An oom_nop might be a good idea. But some different policies, i.e. ones
    with more determinism but less smarts, are interesting.

    Robert Love

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:48    [W:0.018 / U:0.212 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site