lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Sep]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH] deal with lack of acpi prt entries gracefully
From
On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 11:00:30PM +0100, Andrew de Quincey wrote:
> > None of the above. We have our own NUMAlink based interrupt protocol
> > model.
>
> Oooer! Hmm, the existing code would probably NOT like having _PRT entries for
> a model it doesn't know about.... you could add support for it fairly easily
> though I suppose...

Yeah, that's what Andy suggested too. I guess I have to use one of the
reserved fields and try to get the ACPI spec updated.

Thanks,
Jesse
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:48    [W:0.037 / U:0.380 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site