Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 11 Sep 2003 15:04:34 -0700 | Subject | Re: [PATCH] deal with lack of acpi prt entries gracefully | From | (Jesse Barnes) |
| |
On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 11:00:30PM +0100, Andrew de Quincey wrote: > > None of the above. We have our own NUMAlink based interrupt protocol > > model. > > Oooer! Hmm, the existing code would probably NOT like having _PRT entries for > a model it doesn't know about.... you could add support for it fairly easily > though I suppose...
Yeah, that's what Andy suggested too. I guess I have to use one of the reserved fields and try to get the ACPI spec updated.
Thanks, Jesse - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |