Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 10 Sep 2003 12:47:39 +0200 | From | Mike Galbraith <> | Subject | Re: Priority Inversion in Scheduling |
| |
At 11:28 AM 9/10/2003, Nick Piggin wrote:
>Sounds interesting. I my scheduler doesn't have any inversion or >starvation issues that I know of without backboost though. I'd like to >know if you find any.
I haven't been able to stimulate inversion, or found any terminal starvation with your mods. The only things I can see is array switch latency making X choppy under load, and the cpu distribution differences shown by contest (and both may have changed considerably since last version tested).
-Mike
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |