lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Sep]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH][2.6] i386 /proc/irq/.../smp_affinity
    On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 09:55:03PM -0400, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote:
    > - len = 0;
    > - for (k = 0; k < sizeof(cpumask_t)/sizeof(u16); ++k) {
    > - int j = sprintf(page, "%04hx", (u16)cpus_coerce(tmp));
    > - len += j;
    > - page += j;
    > - cpus_shift_right(tmp, tmp, 16);
    > - }
    > - len += sprintf(page, "\n");
    > - return len;
    > + return sprintf(page, "%08x\n", (u32)cpus_coerce(tmp));
    > }
    >
    > static int irq_affinity_write_proc(struct file *file, const char __user *buffer,

    This backs out the variable-length cpu bitmask handling.

    I appear to be printing out 16-bit chunks of all this in what appears
    to be the reverse of the order expected. Why not just reverse the order
    of the 16-bit chunks?

    -- wli
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:48    [W:0.020 / U:30.100 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site