lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Sep]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH][2.6] i386 /proc/irq/.../smp_affinity
On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 09:55:03PM -0400, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote:
> - len = 0;
> - for (k = 0; k < sizeof(cpumask_t)/sizeof(u16); ++k) {
> - int j = sprintf(page, "%04hx", (u16)cpus_coerce(tmp));
> - len += j;
> - page += j;
> - cpus_shift_right(tmp, tmp, 16);
> - }
> - len += sprintf(page, "\n");
> - return len;
> + return sprintf(page, "%08x\n", (u32)cpus_coerce(tmp));
> }
>
> static int irq_affinity_write_proc(struct file *file, const char __user *buffer,

This backs out the variable-length cpu bitmask handling.

I appear to be printing out 16-bit chunks of all this in what appears
to be the reverse of the order expected. Why not just reverse the order
of the 16-bit chunks?

-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:48    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans