Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 1 Sep 2003 16:14:25 -0300 (BRT) | From | Marcelo Tosatti <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] check_gcc for i386 |
| |
On Sun, 31 Aug 2003, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > > On Sat, 30 Aug 2003, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > > Alan Cox wrote: > > > On Sad, 2003-08-30 at 23:58, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > > > > > >>> ifdef CONFIG_MPENTIUM4 > > >>>-CFLAGS += -march=i686 > > >>>+CFLAGS += $(call check_gcc,-march=pentium4,-march=i686) > > >>> endif > > >>> > > >>> ifdef CONFIG_MK6 > > >> > > >>OK, I forgot what that does. Can you please explain in detail what > > >>check_gcc does. > > > > > > > > > Tries to use gcc with the options given and if not falls back to the > > > second set suggested. So it'll try -march=pentium4 (new gcc) and > > > fall back to -march=i686 > > > > > > Yep. I introduced check_gcc into 2.4 (backported from 2.5), in fact. > > > > The above change does exactly what Alan describes, and is a patch I was > > planning to submit myself :) I did not want to change compiler options > > at the time when I submitted the check_gcc patch, but after many months > > of manually patching to get the best compiler flags, it seems solid. > > I'm just worried about having nicey gcc surprises. Alan thinks its ok, and > you too so I guess I'll just apply it tomorrow and see what happens
Changed my mind: I already have enough thinks to care about in 2.4.23 and I prefer NOT accepting such changes instead of doing them. I might change my mind once 2.4.23 is out.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |