[lkml]   [2003]   [Aug]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH] Make cryptoapi non-optional?
    On Sat, Aug 09, 2003 at 07:07:27PM -0700, Robert Love wrote:
    > On Sat, 2003-08-09 at 07:33, Matt Mackall wrote:
    > > - the random number generator is non-optional because it's used
    > > various things from filesystems to networking
    > What if you kept crypto API optional, made random.c a config option, and
    > make that depend on the crypto API. Then -- and this is the non-obvious
    > part -- implement a super lame replacement for get_random_bytes() [what
    > I assume the various parts of the kernel are using] for when
    > !CONFIG_RANDOM is not set?
    > You can do a simple PRNG in <10 lines of C. Have the kernel seed it on
    > boot with xtime or something else lame.

    Eek, let's not go there. Most of the users of get_random_bytes()
    depend on it being strong enough for cryptographic purposes. And we've
    long guaranteed the existence of a cryptographically strong
    /dev/urandom. If userspace could no longer rely on it being there,
    people would be forced to go back to poorly reinventing it in
    userspace - not good. Having random.c be nonoptional is a good note to
    embedded folks that they should think long and hard before ripping it

    Matt Mackall : : of or relating to the moon
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:47    [W:0.025 / U:4.504 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site