[lkml]   [2003]   [Aug]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Filesystem Tests
    On Wed, 2003-08-06 at 04:30, Grant Miner wrote:
    > I tested the performace of various filesystems with a mozilla build tree
    > of 295MB, with primarily writing and copying operations. The test
    > system is Linux 2.6.0-test2, 512MB memory, 11531.85MB partition for
    > tests. Sync is run a few times throughout the test (for full script see
    > bottom of this email). I ran mkfs on the partition before every test.
    > Running the tests again tends to produces similar times, about +/- 3
    > seconds.
    > The first item number is time, in seconds, to complete the test (lower
    > is better). The second number is CPU use percentage (lower is better).
    > reiser4 171.28s, 30%CPU (1.0000x time; 1.0x CPU)
    > reiserfs 302.53s, 16%CPU (1.7663x time; 0.53x CPU)
    > ext3 319.71s, 11%CPU (1.8666x time; 0.36x CPU)
    > xfs 429.79s, 13%CPU (2.5093x time; 0.43x CPU)
    > jfs 470.88s, 6%CPU (2.7492x time 0.02x CPU)

    What about ext2? :-)
    I think it could be interesting to compare the overhead of a journaled
    fs against a non-one, simply for reference.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:47    [W:0.022 / U:42.408 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site