Messages in this thread | | | From | Daniel Ritz <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2.6] ToPIC specific init for yenta_socket | Date | Wed, 6 Aug 2003 22:50:55 +0200 |
| |
On Wed August 6 2003 20:44, Russell King wrote: > On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 08:25:08PM +0200, Daniel Ritz wrote: > > this patch adds override functions for the ToPIC family of controllers. > > also adds the device id for ToPIC100 and (untested) support for zoom > > video for ToPIC97/100. > > > > tested with start/stop and suspend/resume. > > We currently have some fairly serious IRQ problems with yenta at the > moment. I'm holding all patches until we get this problem resolved - > it seems to be caused by several bad changes over the past couple of > years accumulating throughout the 2.5 series.
yep, i saw the mails on lkml...
> > Therefore, I don't want to add any further changes into the mix just > yet.
ok. the topic code is low-prio as these chips works mostly w/o the patch. my craptop just fucks up in 1 of 30 boots or so.
> > Also, assigning to socket->socket.ops->init modifies the global > yenta_socket_operations structure, which I'm far from happy about.
yes, i saw that too, but copy-pasted from the other overrides to fix up in the next patch...i think ->init should always point to yenta_init, the additional init function should be called from inside there, before activating the interrupts...wanna have a patch?
-daniel
ps: in a few days, when i get my other laptop back, i have access to one of those TI chips with all the nice problems (ie. under FreeBigStinkyDaemon the machine dies under an interrupt storm when activating the socket) so i could also test the irq routing and other fixes a bit.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |