Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 6 Aug 2003 15:06:53 +0200 | From | Pavel Machek <> | Subject | Re: [TRIVIAL] sanitize power management config menus, take two |
| |
Hi!
> > I think the correct x86 solution would be to introduce a real dummy > > option for the menus, and imply CONFIG_PM if APM or swsusp (the two > > options that seem to actually need CONFIG_PM code) is enabled. > > I can buy that. There are actually three levels of power management that > we handle: > > - System Power Management (swsusp, CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP) > - Device Power Management (kernel/pm.c, future driver model support) > - CPU Power Management (cpufreq) > > SPM implies that DPM will be enabled, but both DPM and CPM can exist > without SPM, and independently of each other. All of them would > essentially fall under CONFIG_PM.. > > Would you willing to whip up a patch for the Kconfig entries?
We have enough trouble making sure *current* PM code runs with all possible config combinations; I do not think we want more PM options for now.
-- Pavel Written on sharp zaurus, because my Velo1 broke. If you have Velo you don't need...
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |