Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 5 Aug 2003 18:36:48 +0200 | From | Tomas Szepe <> | Subject | Re: [TRIVIAL] sanitize power management config menus, take two |
| |
> [szepe@pinerecords.com] > > > [poup@poupinou.org] > > > > > o only enable cpufreq options if power management is selected > > > o don't put cpufreq options in a separate submenu > > > > Yes, but what I do not understand is why cpufreq need power management. > > Because it is a power management option. :) > > CONFIG_PM is a dummy option, it does not link any code into the kernel > by itself.
Ooops, I ain't right. :)
There actually seems to be code that depends on CONFIG_PM, particularly so on arches other that x86, so the 'depends on PM' clause for cpufreq is indeed bogus.
Thanks for pointing this out, I'll post a fixed patch.
-- Tomas Szepe <szepe@pinerecords.com> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |