[lkml]   [2003]   [Aug]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] O13int for interactivity

    Con Kolivas wrote:

    >On Tue, 5 Aug 2003 12:21, Nick Piggin wrote:
    >>No, this still special-cases the uninterruptible sleep. Why is this
    >>needed? What is being worked around? There is probably a way to
    >>attack the cause of the problem.
    >Footnote: I was thinking of using this to also _elevate_ the dynamic priority
    >of tasks waking from interruptible sleep as well which may help throughput.

    Con, an uninterruptible sleep is one which is not be woken by a signal,
    an interruptible sleep is one which is. There is no other connotation.
    What happens when read/write syscalls are changed to be interruptible?
    I'm not saying this will happen... but come to think of it, NFS probably
    has interruptible read/write.

    In short: make the same policy for an interruptible and an uninterruptible

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:47    [W:0.019 / U:18.500 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site