![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 04:42:05PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > We already have a bucketload of highmem hacks in the kernel, and they are > not sufficient for some people. We have several more (large) highmem hacks > being proposed. Please don't put page clustering anywhere near that blacklist. There's a lot more to it than "gee, wli shrank mem_map[] again". On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 04:42:05PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > wrt long-term kernel purity: one approach would be to not merge 4G+4G into > 2.7 at all. This keeps the long-term kernel codebase saner. It assumes > that the monster 32-bit boxes will have been obsoleted by 64-bit machines > within 3-4 years and that it is acceptable to end-of-line those machines on > a 2.6-based kernel. I think that's pretty safe. Maybe some way to get feedback to/from cpu vendors about this would help. If we really want to kill highmem dead in 2.7, beating cpu vendors with a baseball bat until they^W^W^W^W^W^W^W^Wkindly asking cpu vendors to kill that fucking PAE shit dead (goddammit!) might help. -- wli - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 13:47 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||