lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Aug]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
FromBenjamin Herrenschmidt <>
DateThu, 28 Aug 2003 10:39:00 +0200
SubjectRe: PCI PM & compatibility
On Thu, 2003-08-28 at 01:29, Patrick Mochel wrote:

> I don't understand. We suspend the children before we suspend the device, 
> so as long as all the children go done, so will the parent device.

Forget it... It had crap in mind. Anyway, my point was actually the
opposite than what I wrote :( I was really to make sure that if a
device is "held" up by pm_users beeing non-NULL, it's _parents_
(and not it's children, sorry about the confusion), are also held
non-suspended... I think I'll sleep a bit and then just go look at
the code ;)

Ben.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:48    [from the cache]
©2003-2008