![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Thu, 2003-08-28 at 01:29, Patrick Mochel wrote: > I don't understand. We suspend the children before we suspend the device, > so as long as all the children go done, so will the parent device. Forget it... It had crap in mind. Anyway, my point was actually the opposite than what I wrote :( I was really to make sure that if a device is "held" up by pm_users beeing non-NULL, it's _parents_ (and not it's children, sorry about the confusion), are also held non-suspended... I think I'll sleep a bit and then just go look at the code ;) Ben. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:48 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||