Messages in this thread | | | From | (Måns Rullgård) | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Nick's scheduler policy v7 | Date | Mon, 25 Aug 2003 16:36:12 +0200 |
| |
Nick Piggin <piggin@cyberone.com.au> writes:
> This one has a few changes. Children now get a priority boost > on fork, and parents retain more priority after forking a child, > however exiting CPU hogs will now penalise parents a bit. > > Timeslice scaling was tweaked a bit. Oh and remember raising X's > priority should _help_ interactivity with this patch, and IMO is > not an unreasonable thing to be doing. > > Please test. I'm not getting enough feedback!
OK, if you test my software.
Seriously, though, it seems OK at first glance. I can't reproduce the XEmacs problems I had with Con's recent versions. I'll have to run it for a while and see what it seems like.
-- Måns Rullgård mru@users.sf.net
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |