![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Sad, 2003-08-02 at 18:04, Werner Almesberger wrote: > - last but not least, keeping TOE firmware up to date with the > TCP/IP stack in the mainstream kernel will require - for each > such TOE device - a significant and continuous effort over a > long period of time or even the protocol and protocol refinements.. > - instead of putting a different stack on the TOE, a > general-purpose processor (probably with some enhancements, > and certainly with optimized data paths) is added to the NIC Like say an opteron in the 2nd socket on the motherboard > Benefits: > > - putting the CPU next to the NIC keeps data paths short, and > allows for all kinds of optimizations (e.g. a pipelined > memory architecture) It moves the cost it doesnt make it vanish If I read you right you are arguing for a second processor running Linux.with its own independant memory bus. AMD make those already its called AMD64. I don't know anyone thinking at that level about partitioning one as an I/O processor. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 13:47 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||