[lkml]   [2003]   [Aug]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: cache limit
    "J.A. Magallon" <> wrote:
    > > It was not. Instead we have fadvise. So it would be appropriate to change
    > Does this work in 2.4 ?
    > If not, any patch flying around ?

    No. It would be fairly messy to implement in 2.4 because 2.4 does not have
    the per-inode radix trees for pagecache. The implementation would need to
    walk every page attached to the inode just to shoot down a single page.
    And all of it underneath the global pagecache lock.

    But it is certainly possible.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:47    [W:0.054 / U:5.548 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site