[lkml]   [2003]   [Aug]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [CFT][PATCH] new scheduler policy
    On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 03:34:06PM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
    > Matt Mackall wrote:
    > >
    > >You forgot to mention fork() splitting its timeslice 2/3 to 1/3 parent
    > >to child.
    > >
    > >
    > Hmm... did I do that? I don't actually have the code in front of me, but I
    > think the timeslice split is still 50/50 (see fork.c). Its the priority
    > points that go 2/3 to 1/3. Actually its a bit more complex than that even
    > and probably not exactly right...

    Actually, it's as you say. The terms sleeptime and timeslice just
    confused me.

    Matt Mackall : : of or relating to the moon
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:47    [W:0.022 / U:0.180 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site