[lkml]   [2003]   [Aug]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRE: Dumb question: Why are exceptions such as SIGSEGV not logged

    > And why not just catch the ones sent from the kernel? That's the one that
    > is killing the program because it crashed, and that's the one the
    > origional
    > poster wants logged...

    Because sometimes a program wants to terminate. And it is perfectly legal
    for a programmer who needs to terminate his program as quickly as possible
    to do this:

    char *j=NULL;
    signal(SIGSEGV, SIG_DFL);

    This is a perfectly sensible thing for a program to do with well-defined
    semantics. If a program wants to create a child every minute like this and
    kill it, that's perfectly fine. We should be able to do that in the default
    configuration without a sysadmin complaining that we're DoSing his syslogs.


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:47    [W:0.020 / U:35.980 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site