Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 18 Aug 2003 14:02:38 -0700 | From | Mike Fedyk <> | Subject | Re: Dumb question: Why are exceptions such as SIGSEGV not logged |
| |
On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 04:50:49PM -0400, Hank Leininger wrote: > ..So not *all* such cases are cause for alarm. However, if you run one of > the patches enabling logging of this, you quickly learn what's normal for > the apps you run, and can teach your log-auditing tools and/or your brain > to ignore them.
And why not just catch the ones sent from the kernel? That's the one that is killing the program because it crashed, and that's the one the origional poster wants logged... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |