[lkml]   [2003]   [Aug]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: scsi proc_info called unconditionally
    On Sun, Aug 17, 2003 at 10:56:17AM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
    > It probably should give the driver name and version. Christoph is
    > right in the longer term but in the real world people still expect
    > /proc/scsi/* to contain at least that info.

    /proc/scsi/* is not standardized so even if you add a name no
    userspace tool can sanely parse it without knowing all drivers.
    sysfs OTOH can do this sanely.

    So, no it does not make sense to add anything here for a 2.6 driver.

    > Possibly for 2.7.x /proc/scsi/* should become an fs or entirely sysfs

    /proc/scsi/ will be optional and marked deprecated with with one of my
    next patches and go away in 2.9.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:47    [W:0.030 / U:27.556 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site