Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 12 Aug 2003 10:56:51 -0700 | From | Simon Kirby <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH]O14int |
| |
On Sun, Aug 10, 2003 at 07:06:34PM +1000, Con Kolivas wrote:
> Is this with or without my changes? The old scheduler was not very scalable; > that's why we moved. The new one has other intrinsic issues that I (and > others) have been trying to address, but is much much more scalable. It was > not possible to make the old one more scalable, but it is possible to make > this one more interactive.
Without your changes. Are you changing the design or just tuning certain cases? I was talking more about the theory behind the scheduling decisions and not about particular cases.
The O(1) scheduler changes definitely help scalability and I don't have any problem with that change (unless it introduced the behavior I'm talking about).
Simon- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |