Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: generic strncpy - off-by-one error | From | Valdis.Kletnieks@vt ... | Date | Tue, 12 Aug 2003 12:19:50 -0400 |
| |
On Tue, 12 Aug 2003 16:54:05 BST, William Gallafent said:
> Er, consider the case of count == 1. Fenceposts can be dangerous things.
Amen, given the original code and the first attempt to fix it. I was actually trolling for "accidentally correct" versus "intentionally correct".
/Valdis (who has posted "convince me the code is right THIS time" waay too many times on waaay too many lists already today - including one count-the-on-bits scheme that only worked for an all-zeros input.. ;) [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |