Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 11 Aug 2003 07:31:36 +0200 | From | Mike Galbraith <> | Subject | Re: [patch] SCHED_SOFTRR starve-free linux scheduling policy ... |
| |
At 09:28 PM 8/10/2003 +0100, Daniel Phillips wrote:
>there's a cap on that. And anyway, why aren't those kernel threads running >with realtime priority in the first place?
Good question. events, kblockd and aio at least look like they should.
>While we're in here: what should be the maximum realtime priority granted >to a >normal user? It should probably be another adminstrator knob.
That's an easy one.. the top of the SCHED_SOFTRR range ;)
-Mike
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |