Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 10 Aug 2003 18:08:49 +0200 | From | Pascal Brisset <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] loop: fixing cryptoloop troubles. |
| |
James Morris writes: > See RFC 2410, section 2 :-)
This says NULL is the identity function, which is not the same as:
static void null_encrypt(void *ctx, u8 *dst, const u8 *src) { }
In practice this code never gets called because cbc_process() has a special case for iv==NULL. But I'd rather see a semantically correct reference implementation. Or just leave .cia_encrypt=NULL.
Am I missing something here ?
-- Pascal
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |