Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 1 Aug 2003 14:34:50 -0400 | From | Mark Mielke <> | Subject | Re: Re: What's the timeslice size for kernel 2.6.0-test2, IA32? |
| |
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 02:04:46PM -0230, Stephen Anthony wrote: > It would be great if sleeps were 1ms accurate instead of 10ms. It would > make synchronization code a lot easier.
Doesn't this depend on what HZ you define for the kernel?
If you want 1ms sleep, just set HZ to 1000HZ+, and give your process a high priority?
mark
-- mark@mielke.cc/markm@ncf.ca/markm@nortelnetworks.com __________________________ . . _ ._ . . .__ . . ._. .__ . . . .__ | Neighbourhood Coder |\/| |_| |_| |/ |_ |\/| | |_ | |/ |_ | | | | | | \ | \ |__ . | | .|. |__ |__ | \ |__ | Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
One ring to rule them all, one ring to find them, one ring to bring them all and in the darkness bind them...
http://mark.mielke.cc/
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |