Messages in this thread | | | From | Peter Chubb <> | Date | Thu, 10 Jul 2003 12:01:27 +1000 | Subject | Re: 2.5.74-mm1 |
| |
>>>>> "Daniel" == Daniel Phillips <phillips@arcor.de> writes:
Daniel> I like your idea of allowing normal users to set SCHED_RR, but Daniel> automatically placing some bound on cpu usage. It's Daniel> guaranteed not to break any existing programs.
I suspect that what's really wanted here is not SCHED_RR but guaranteed rate-of-forward progress. A dynamic-window-constrained scheduler (that guarantees not that you'll run until you sleep, but that in any (settable) time period you'll get the opportunity to run for at least (a smaller settable period)) is closer to what's wanted.
See http://www.cs.bu.edu/fac/richwest/dwcs.html
-- Dr Peter Chubb http://www.gelato.unsw.edu.au peterc AT gelato.unsw.edu.au You are lost in a maze of BitKeeper repositories, all slightly different. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |