![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 12:45:52AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > The patch is orthogonal to wli's pgcl patch - both patches try to achieve > the same, with different methods. I can very well imagine workloads where > we want to have the combination of the two patches. Well, your patch does have the advantage of not being a "break all drivers" affair. Also, even though pgcl scales "perfectly" wrt. highmem (nm the code being a train wreck), the raw capacity increase is needed. There are enough other reasons to go through with ABI-preserving page clustering that they're not really in competition with each other. Looks good to me. I'll spin it up tonight. -- wli - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 13:46 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||