[lkml]   [2003]   [Jul]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Status of the IO scheduler fixes for 2.4
On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 05:37:35PM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
> I've also attached a patch I've been working on to solve the latencies a
> different way. bdflush-progress.diff changes balance_dirty to wait on
> bdflush instead of trying to start io. It helps a lot here (both
> throughput and latency) but hasn't yet been tested on a box with tons of
> drives.

that's orthogonal, it changes the write throttling, it doesn't touch the
blkdev layer like the other patches does. So if it helps it solves a
different kind of latencies.

However the implementation in theory can run the box oom, since it won't
limit the dirty buffers anymore. To be safe you need to wait 2
generations. I doubt in practice it would be easily reproducible though ;).

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:46    [W:0.071 / U:3.780 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site