[lkml]   [2003]   [Jul]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: 2.5.74-mm1
    On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 02:15:08PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
    > Helge Hafting <> wrote:
    > > I may have this problem on my dual celeron. I noticed X got sluggish
    > > while generating a key for mozilla - very strange on a dual
    > > but I put it down to the scheduler changes.
    > >
    > > Looking at dmesg I see that both is detected, and it claims
    > > both are "activated", but I get this a little later:
    > ok. If you're feeling keen could you please revert the cpumask_t patch.
    > And please send the .config, thanks.

    I'm sorry, both cpu's are up. I did a better test
    with busy loops. One high-priority (nice --10)
    busy loop has no effect on performance, two such ones
    makes the mouse cursor very jumpy.

    So both cpus are working, after all and not merely being
    detected. I'm using gcc 3.3 from debian testing.

    Helge Hafting
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:46    [W:0.019 / U:14.248 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site