Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 31 Jul 2003 06:30:55 -0700 | From | David Brownell <> | Subject | Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: OHCI problems with suspend/resume |
| |
Pavel Machek wrote: >>The "initiators" all talk to _both_ infrastructures, but they >>don't talk to the driver model stuff in the same way. For >>example, on suspend: >> >> ... > > Where does acpi call pm_*()? It seems like it does not and it seems > like a bug to me.
Doesn't; it showed up in a 'grep' that I should have examined more closely. Sorry! But both swsusp and APM have the "using both registration schemes" issue (consistency matters here).
Why does it seem like a bug -- because it's using only the "new" infrastructure, while there are still a few drivers that only register to the old one? I'd rather see those drivers (about a dozen) have compile time #ifdef CONFIG_PM #warnings, and call them the bug...
- Dave
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |