[lkml]   [2003]   [Jul]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Status of the IO scheduler fixes for 2.4
On Thu, 2003-07-03 at 08:31, Marc-Christian Petersen wrote:
> On Thursday 03 July 2003 04:02, Chris Mason wrote:
> Hi Chris,
> > So, the patch attached includes the q->full code but has it off by
> > default. I've got code locally for an elvtune interface that can toggle
> > q->full check on a per device basis, as well as tune the max io per
> > queue. I've got two choices on how to submit it, I can either add a new
> > ioctl or abuse the max_bomb_segments field in the existing ioctl.
> > If we can agree on the userland tuning side, I can have some kind of
> > elvtune patch tomorrow.
> what about /proc ?

Always an option. If elvtune didn't exist at all I'd say proc was a
better choice. But I do want to be able to tune things on a per device
basis, which probably means a new directory tree somewhere in proc. Our
chances are only 50/50 of getting that patch in without a long thread
about the one true way to access kernel tunables through an fs
interface visible to userland ;-)

For the most part I'm only visiting drivers/block/*.c right now, so I'll
code whatever interface the long term maintainers hate the least.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:46    [W:0.134 / U:1.548 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site