lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Jul]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: 2.5.74-mm1
    Helge Hafting <helgehaf@aitel.hist.no> wrote:
    >
    > On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 12:22:43PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
    > > Boszormenyi Zoltan <zboszor@freemail.hu> wrote:
    > > >
    > > > Hi,
    > > >
    > > > I actually tried it. It seems that although I compiled an SMP kernel, it
    > > > does not use both CPUs.
    > >
    > > You're right. The kernel sort-of saw the second CPU but it appears to have
    > > not come up.
    > >
    > I may have this problem on my dual celeron. I noticed X got sluggish
    > while generating a key for mozilla - very strange on a dual
    > but I put it down to the scheduler changes.
    >
    > Looking at dmesg I see that both is detected, and it claims
    > both are "activated", but I get this a little later:
    >
    > Starting migration thread for cpu 0
    > Bringing up 1
    > CPU 1 IS NOW UP!
    > Starting migration thread for cpu 1
    > CPUS done 2
    > mtrr: v2.0 (20020519)
    >
    > I never get a CPU 2 IS NOW UP (or CPU 0)
    >

    ok. If you're feeling keen could you please revert the cpumask_t patch.

    And please send the .config, thanks.
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:46    [W:0.043 / U:124.044 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site