lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Jul]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: 2.5.74-mm1
Helge Hafting <helgehaf@aitel.hist.no> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 12:22:43PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Boszormenyi Zoltan <zboszor@freemail.hu> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I actually tried it. It seems that although I compiled an SMP kernel, it
> > > does not use both CPUs.
> >
> > You're right. The kernel sort-of saw the second CPU but it appears to have
> > not come up.
> >
> I may have this problem on my dual celeron. I noticed X got sluggish
> while generating a key for mozilla - very strange on a dual
> but I put it down to the scheduler changes.
>
> Looking at dmesg I see that both is detected, and it claims
> both are "activated", but I get this a little later:
>
> Starting migration thread for cpu 0
> Bringing up 1
> CPU 1 IS NOW UP!
> Starting migration thread for cpu 1
> CPUS done 2
> mtrr: v2.0 (20020519)
>
> I never get a CPU 2 IS NOW UP (or CPU 0)
>

ok. If you're feeling keen could you please revert the cpumask_t patch.

And please send the .config, thanks.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:46    [W:0.100 / U:0.476 seconds]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site