Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 29 Jul 2003 08:35:07 -0700 | From | "Randy.Dunlap" <> | Subject | Re: 2.6-test2: gcc-3.3.1 warning. |
| |
On 29 Jul 2003 12:57:52 +0100 Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
| On Maw, 2003-07-29 at 11:20, Tomas Szepe wrote: | > > What is the difference between backporting a patch from 3.3.1-pre to 3.3, | > > and using 3.3.1-pre directly ? Ah, that you get less bug corrected. | > | > Large. 3.3 is a development series. It DOES introduce new stuff. | > | > In production environments you definitely want to stick with 3.2.3 | > or (better yet) 2.95.3. | | 3.2 is probably the best, but lots of people are using gcc 3.3 to build | kernels and so far all the things we've hit have been the stricter | parser throwing up on technically invalid C in the kernel source/
I really hate to get this back to the original problem, but is the reported warning a gcc 3.3.x problem? I don't see the assembly problem here.
| arch/i386/kernel/reboot.c: In function `machine_restart': | arch/i386/kernel/reboot.c:261: warning: use of memory input without | lvalue in asm operand 0 is deprecated
-- ~Randy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |