[lkml]   [2003]   [Jul]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] O10int for interactivity wrote:

    > I'm guessing that the anticipatory scheduler is the culprit here. Soon as I figure
    > out the incantations to use the deadline scheduler, I'll report back....

    It would be unfortunate if AS and the interactivity scheduler were to
    conflict. Is there a way we can have them talk to each other and have
    AS boost some I/O requests for tasks which are marked as interactive?

    It would sacrifice some throughput for the sake of interactivity, which
    is what the interactivity patches do anyhow. This is a reasonable

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:47    [W:0.018 / U:10.392 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site