Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 28 Jul 2003 16:44:07 +0400 | From | Hans Reiser <> | Subject | Re: Reiser4 status: benchmarked vs. V3 (and ext3) |
| |
Daniel Egger wrote:
>Am Son, 2003-07-27 um 14.59 schrieb Hans Reiser: > > > >>I thought that close was fine, it was putting it in the same block that >>was the problem? >> >> > >This looks fine for normal harddrives put on flash you'd probably like >to write the data evenly over the free space in some already formatted >section still leaving the oportunity to format some other sectors to not >run out of space. > I was not able to parse the sentence above.;-)
> > > >>Again, I think this is best solved in the device layer. >> >> > >A device layer that shuffles around sectors would have interesting >semantics, like hardly being portable because one would have to use >exactly the same device driver with the same parameters to use the >filesystem and thus retrieve the data. > > > No, you could be more clever than that.
-- Hans
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |