[lkml]   [2003]   [Jul]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Ingo Molnar and Con Kolivas 2.6 scheduler patches
    Hi Con,

    On Sun, Jul 27, 2003 at 12:38:37PM +1000, Con Kolivas wrote:

    > No, this is what I have been trying to figure out; why is it that if we put
    > all the settings the same as 2.4 that it doesn't perform as nicely. 2.5/6
    > with the old settings is certainly better than with the vanilla settings, but
    > not as good as 2.4 O(1). It does not appear to be scheduler alone, but the
    > architectural changes to 2.5 that have changed interactivity are here to
    > stay, and improving the interactivity estimator in the scheduler does help it
    > anyway.

    just a thought : have you tried to set the timer to 100Hz instead of 1kHz to
    compare with 2.4 ? It might make a difference too.


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:47    [W:0.019 / U:6.280 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site