[lkml]   [2003]   [Jul]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Ingo Molnar and Con Kolivas 2.6 scheduler patches
Hi Con,

On Sun, Jul 27, 2003 at 12:38:37PM +1000, Con Kolivas wrote:

> No, this is what I have been trying to figure out; why is it that if we put
> all the settings the same as 2.4 that it doesn't perform as nicely. 2.5/6
> with the old settings is certainly better than with the vanilla settings, but
> not as good as 2.4 O(1). It does not appear to be scheduler alone, but the
> architectural changes to 2.5 that have changed interactivity are here to
> stay, and improving the interactivity estimator in the scheduler does help it
> anyway.

just a thought : have you tried to set the timer to 100Hz instead of 1kHz to
compare with 2.4 ? It might make a difference too.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:47    [W:0.150 / U:0.044 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site