Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 26 Jul 2003 11:19:13 -0700 | From | William Lee Irwin III <> | Subject | Re: Ingo Molnar and Con Kolivas 2.6 scheduler patches |
| |
On Sat, Jul 26, 2003 at 11:46:45AM +0200, Marc-Christian Petersen wrote: > Now that I've tested 2.6.0-test-1-wli (William Lee Irwin's Tree) for over a > week, I thought about, that the problem might _not_ be only the O(1) > Scheduler, because -wli has changed almost nothing to the scheduler stuff, > it's almost 2.6.0-test1 code and running that kernel, my system is _alot_ > more responsive than 2.6.0-test1 or 2.6.0-test1-mm* or all the Oxint > scheduler fixes have ever been. > Strange no? > P.S.: I've not tested Ingo's G3 scheduler fix yet. More to come.
I've no plausible explanation for this; perhaps the only possible one is that one of the algorithms that was sped up was behaving badly enough to interfere with scheduling.
-- wli - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |