lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Jul]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: 2.4 -> 2.2 differences?


    Too bad you don't have anything they gave you or which they took back
    from you that could be used against them.


    Thus spake Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk):

    > On Sad, 2003-07-26 at 00:29, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
    > > In article <20030725142434.GS32585@rdlg.net> you wrote:
    > > > With all the SCO fun going on I have people asking me what functionality
    > > > we would loose if we rolled from 2.4.21 kernel to the last known stable
    > > > 2.2 kernel.
    > >
    > > it is easier to turn off SMP.
    > >
    > > BTW: what will happen if there is some SMP code from IBM in the kernel which
    > > is owned by SCO? Isnt it a matter of days to remove that code? Does anybody
    > > have to pay for past usage of the code?
    >
    > The core 2.2 SMP code is stuff I wrote. Caldera (aka SCO) even provided
    > me the hardware and asked me to do it. The later table parser code is
    > from Intel.
    >
    >
    > -
    > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    :wq!
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Robert L. Harris | GPG Key ID: E344DA3B
    @ x-hkp://pgp.mit.edu
    DISCLAIMER:
    These are MY OPINIONS ALONE. I speak for no-one else.

    Diagnosis: witzelsucht

    IPv6 = robert@ipv6.rdlg.net http://ipv6.rdlg.net
    IPv4 = robert@mail.rdlg.net http://www.rdlg.net
    [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:47    [W:0.020 / U:90.008 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site