lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Jul]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: asm (lidt) question
    On Tue, 22 Jul 2003, Randy.Dunlap wrote:

    > On Tue, 22 Jul 2003 10:31:37 -0700 (PDT) Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> wrote:
    >
    > | On Tue, 22 Jul 2003, Jamie Lokier wrote:
    > |
    > | > Davide Libenzi wrote:
    > | > > IMHO, since "var" is really an output parameter.
    > | >
    > | > "var" is read, not written.
    > | > I think you are confusing "lidt" with "sidt".
    > |
    > | Actually I don't even know what I was confusing, since L and S are not
    > | there for nothing ;) And yes, the form with =m as input parameter should
    > | be corrected, even if it generates the same code.
    >
    > Yes, less confusion is better, so here's a patch to use the
    > same reasonable syntax in all places.
    >
    > Look OK? Generates the same code, as Davide pointed out.

    Yep, that's the right syntax (pls push to Andrew or Linus) ;)



    - Davide

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:47    [W:0.027 / U:0.580 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site