Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 22 Jul 2003 11:58:16 -0700 (PDT) | From | Davide Libenzi <> | Subject | Re: asm (lidt) question |
| |
On Tue, 22 Jul 2003, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Jul 2003 10:31:37 -0700 (PDT) Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> wrote: > > | On Tue, 22 Jul 2003, Jamie Lokier wrote: > | > | > Davide Libenzi wrote: > | > > IMHO, since "var" is really an output parameter. > | > > | > "var" is read, not written. > | > I think you are confusing "lidt" with "sidt". > | > | Actually I don't even know what I was confusing, since L and S are not > | there for nothing ;) And yes, the form with =m as input parameter should > | be corrected, even if it generates the same code. > > Yes, less confusion is better, so here's a patch to use the > same reasonable syntax in all places. > > Look OK? Generates the same code, as Davide pointed out.
Yep, that's the right syntax (pls push to Andrew or Linus) ;)
- Davide
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |