lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Jul]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [Fwd: Re: Kernel 2.4 CPU Arch issues]
Alan Cox wrote:
> On Llu, 2003-07-21 at 00:29, William M. Quarles wrote:
>
>>Well, you separated the Pentium and Pentium-MMX. It's the exact same
>>difference between Pentium Pro and Pentium-II: MMX technology. That's
>>the point.
>
>
> This makes no difference to the kernel. Splitting PPro would only make
> sense for one reason. The Pentium Pro needs store barriers on
> spin_unlock and friends, the PII and later do not. However if this was
> done you'd also want to check for PPro boots with a PII kernel and panic
> which isn't currently done
>

Well, wouldn't changing the gcc -march option and/or adding -mcpu
options for the various processors in the Makefile make a difference, as
the patchfile suggests?

--
William M. Quarles

quarlewm@jmu.edu
wquarles@bucknell.edu
walrus@bellsouth.net

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:47    [W:1.867 / U:1.052 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site