[lkml]   [2003]   [Jul]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Software suspend testing in 2.6.0-test1

> > I wanted to avoid that: we do want user threads refrigerated at that
> > point so that we know noone is allocating memory as we are trying to
> > do memory shrink. I'd like to avoid having refrigerator run in two
> > phases....
> But we should be the only process running, and we can guarantee that by
> not sleeping and doing preempt_disable() when we begin. Especially
> if we start the refrigeration sequence after we shrink
> memory. Right?

If we refrigerate after we shrink, userspace can allocate everything
just after shrink.
When do you have a heart between your knees?
[Johanka's followup: and *two* hearts?]
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:46    [W:0.046 / U:3.584 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site