[lkml]   [2003]   [Jul]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Software suspend testing in 2.6.0-test1

    > > I wanted to avoid that: we do want user threads refrigerated at that
    > > point so that we know noone is allocating memory as we are trying to
    > > do memory shrink. I'd like to avoid having refrigerator run in two
    > > phases....
    > But we should be the only process running, and we can guarantee that by
    > not sleeping and doing preempt_disable() when we begin. Especially
    > if we start the refrigeration sequence after we shrink
    > memory. Right?

    If we refrigerate after we shrink, userspace can allocate everything
    just after shrink.
    When do you have a heart between your knees?
    [Johanka's followup: and *two* hearts?]
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:46    [W:0.024 / U:45.852 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site