Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 17 Jul 2003 15:28:19 -0700 | From | "Randy.Dunlap" <> | Subject | asm (lidt) question |
| |
In arch/i386/kernel, inline asm for loading IDT (lidt) is used a few times, but with slightly different constraints and output/input definitions. Are these OK, equivalent, or what?
[rddunlap@dragon kernel]$ findc lidt ./cpu/common.c:484: __asm__ __volatile__("lidt %0": "=m" (idt_descr)); ./traps.c:783: __asm__ __volatile__("lidt %0": "=m" (idt_descr));
vs.
./reboot.c:186: __asm__ __volatile__ ("lidt %0" : : "m" (real_mode_idt)); ./reboot.c:261: __asm__ __volatile__("lidt %0": :"m" (no_idt)); ./suspend.c:95: asm volatile ("lidt %0" :: "m" (saved_context.idt_limit));
Thanks, -- ~Randy [yes, i've looked at the inline asm docs] For Linux-2.6: http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/post-halloween-2.5.txt or http://lwn.net/Articles/39901/ http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rusty/modules/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |