lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Jul]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: 2.6.0-test1-mm1
William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 07:41:55AM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> >> Oh, well that won't fly; it effectively isn't a constant initializer.
> >> I'll see what can be rammed past gcc. We're shooting for something
> >> with array element 0 equal to 0x1UL and all others 0.
>
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 08:02:07AM -0700, Barry K. Nathan wrote:
> > BTW, following my e-mail signature in this message is my .config. I
> > guess the most notable setting is that CONFIG_SMP is disabled (i.e.,
> > it's a UP compile).
>
> Hmm. Well, ditching the strong typechecking would "fix" it, though
> that's really only papering over it.
>

It doesn't _have_ to be initialised at compile time. Just stick a
little loop in init_IRQ()?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:46    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans