lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Jul]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [Swsusp-devel] Re: Thoughts wanted on merging Software Suspend enhancements
Without debugging code it could look more like..

> > [nigel@laptop-linux nigel]$ ls -l /proc/swsusp/
> > total 0
> > -rw------- 1 root root 0 Jul 15 08:28 enable_escape
> > -rw------- 1 root root 0 Jul 15 08:28 image_size_limit
> > -r-------- 1 root root 0 Jul 15 08:28 interface_version
> > -r-------- 1 root root 0 Jul 15 08:28 last_result
> > -r-------- 1 root root 0 Jul 15 08:28 version
> > [nigel@laptop-linux nigel]$
> >
> Ouch.. But how many of these /proc tweaks need to stay there once
> debugging is done? I do not like any configuration options for
> swsusp... It should just work. [Okay, we probably need to have resume=
> parameter.]

It does just work, but there is room for preferences too. I like
flexibility, and try to build it into my code.

> For 2.4.X I don't care. For official tree, it has to "just work" with
> as little configuration as possible. [Besides enable_escape, what else
> might user want to tweak?]

The limit on the size of the image (they may want a smaller image than
the amount of swap they have).

--
Nigel Cunningham
495 St Georges Road South, Hastings 4201, New Zealand

You see, at just the right time, when we were still powerless,
Christ died for the ungodly.
-- Romans 5:6, NIV.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:46    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site